Msg 206, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Operand type clash: date is incompatible with int
The code wasn't touched in a long time... so what could be the issue. Let's reproduce it here
First create the following table
CREATE TABLE testRunningTotal(Id tinyint,SomeDate datetime, Charge decimal(20,2)) INSERT testRunningTotal SELECT 1,'20120101',1000 UNION ALL SELECT 1,'20120401',200 UNION ALL SELECT 1,'20120501',300 UNION ALL SELECT 1,'20120601',600 UNION ALL SELECT 2,'20120101',100 UNION ALL SELECT 2,'20130101',500 UNION ALL SELECT 2,'20140101',-800 UNION ALL SELECT 3,'20120101',100
Running this query to see what is in this table
SELECT * FROM testRunningTotal
Id SomeDate Charge
1 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 1000.00
1 2012-04-01 00:00:00.000 200.00
1 2012-05-01 00:00:00.000 300.00
1 2012-06-01 00:00:00.000 600.00
2 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 100.00
2 2013-01-01 00:00:00.000 500.00
2 2014-01-01 00:00:00.000 -800.00
3 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 100.00
Now run our fancy query...
SELECT id, someDate as StartDate, LEAD(SomeDate -1,1,'99991231') OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate) as Enddate, Charge, SUM(Charge) OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS RunningTotal FROM testRunningTotal ORDER BY id, SomeDate
Here are our results
id StartDate Enddate Charge RunningTotal
1 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 2012-03-31 00:00:00.000 1000.00 1000.00
1 2012-04-01 00:00:00.000 2012-04-30 00:00:00.000 200.00 1200.00
1 2012-05-01 00:00:00.000 2012-05-31 00:00:00.000 300.00 1500.00
1 2012-06-01 00:00:00.000 9999-12-31 00:00:00.000 600.00 2100.00
2 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 2012-12-31 00:00:00.000 100.00 100.00
2 2013-01-01 00:00:00.000 2013-12-31 00:00:00.000 500.00 600.00
2 2014-01-01 00:00:00.000 9999-12-31 00:00:00.000 -800.00 -200.00
3 2012-01-01 00:00:00.000 9999-12-31 00:00:00.000 100.00 100.00
To see what the query actually does, visit this post Easy running totals with windowing functions
Let's take a closer look at the LEAD analytical function, this is what Books On Line has on its page
LEAD ( scalar_expression [ ,offset ] , [ default ] )
OVER ( [ partition_by_clause ] order_by_clause )
offset
The number of rows forward from the current row from which to obtain a value. If not specified, the default is 1. offset can be a column, subquery, or other expression that evaluates to a positive integer or can be implicitly converted to bigint. offset cannot be a negative value or an analytic function.
Looks all cool to me..nothing that stands out that could cause a problem...
What will happen if someone changes the column from a datetime to a date? Maybe they looked at the data and saw that all the values had only dates and no time components... why use 8 bytes of storage when you can use 3 instead?
To find out exactly what will happen, run the following DDL statement....
ALTER TABLE testRunningTotal ALTER COLUMN SomeDate date
Now go run your query again
SELECT id, someDate as StartDate, LEAD(SomeDate -1,1,'99991231') OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate) as Enddate, Charge, SUM(Charge) OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS RunningTotal FROM testRunningTotal ORDER BY id, SomeDate
Here is the error you get
Msg 206, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Operand type clash: date is incompatible with int
The error is the same as if you would run the following
SELECT CONVERT(DATE,GETDATE() )-1
Instead what you have to do is use the DATEADD function to do arithmetic with dates
SELECT DATEADD(dd,-1,CONVERT(DATE,GETDATE()))
So to fix our query from before, we want to change the -1 to be DATEADD(dd,-1 instead, here is what our query looks like
SELECT id, someDate as StartDate, LEAD(dateadd(dd,-1,SomeDate),1,'99991231') OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate) as Enddate, Charge, SUM(Charge) OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY SomeDate ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS RunningTotal FROM testRunningTotal ORDER BY id, SomeDate
And here are our results, it's all good now
id StartDate Enddate Charge RunningTotal
1 2012-01-01 2012-03-31 1000.00 1000.00
1 2012-04-01 2012-04-30 200.00 1200.00
1 2012-05-01 2012-05-31 300.00 1500.00
1 2012-06-01 9999-12-31 600.00 2100.00
2 2012-01-01 2012-12-31 100.00 100.00
2 2013-01-01 2013-12-31 500.00 600.00
2 2014-01-01 9999-12-31 -800.00 -200.00
3 2012-01-01 9999-12-31 100.00 100.00
I still think that maybe the LEAD function should do this conversion internally since all we are doing is specifying the OFFSET...what is your opinion?
No comments:
Post a Comment