Found this on the TechNet site; sample scripts and stored procedures for managing and working with SQL Server 2005. However on the TechNet site the code is spread ove several pages. I decided to make a user-friendly list instead
Buffer Cache
Sample scripts and stored procedures for managing and monitoring the SQL Server buffer cache.
Retrieve Buffer Counts by Object and Index
CPU and Optimization
Sample scripts and stored procedures for optimizing CPU performance in SQL Server.
Determine CPU Resources Required for Optimization
Retrieve Parallel Statements With the Highest Worker Time
Retrieve Statements with the Highest Plan Re-Use Counts
Retrieve Statements with the Lowest Plan Re-Use Counts
Indexes and Indexing
Sample scripts and stored procedures for working with SQL Server indexes.
Analyze Index Statistics
Create/Truncate an Indexstats Table
Determine Index Cost Benefits
Identify Missing Indexes
List Indexes With the Most Contention
Retrieve Index Statistics
Retrieve Index Usage Statistics
Retrieve Indexes Not Used Since the Last Recycle Time
Retrieve Object and Index Fragmentation Information
Retrieve Tables, Indexes, Files, and File Groups Information
Input/Output
Sample scripts and stored procedures for managing and monitoring input and output in SQL Server.
Calculate Average Stalls
List Queries That Could Benefit From an Index
List Rarely-Used Indexes
List Statements By Input/Output Usage
Performance (General)
Sample scripts and stored procedures for managing and monitoring general performance issue in SQL Server.
List Cached Plans Where Worker Time Exceeds Elapsed Time
List Currently-Executing Parallel Plans
List Recompiled Statements
List Runnable Queues
List Statements With the Highest Average CPU Time
List Statements with the Highest Execution Counts
List Top Wait Types for a Workload
Processor Cache
Sample scripts and stored procedures for managing the SQL Server processor cache.
Compare Single-Use and Re-Used Plans
List Statements By Plan Re-Use Count
SQL Text
Sample scripts and stored procedures for working with SQL text.
Retrieve a SQL Statement with a Specified .SQL_Handle
Retrieve SQL Text and XML Plans
SQLOS
Sample scripts and stored procedures for working with the new SQL Server Operating System Layer.
Compare Signal Waits and Resource Waits
List Currently-Executing Statements
List Scheduler Wait List Information
List Schedulers, Workers, and Runnable Queues
List Session and Scheduler ID Information
List SQLOS Execution Model Information
List Statements from a Specified Waiter List
Tempdb
Sample scripts and stored procedures for working with the tempdb system database.
List Real Time Tempdb Task Usage
List Real-Time Tempdb Statements
Transactions and Logging
Sample scripts for working with SQL Server transactions and locks.
Compare Locking and Repeatable Reads
Configure a Block Condition
Handle a Block Condition
List Lock and Serializable Information
List Locks and Reads
List Locks and Repeatable Reads
List Real-Time Blocker and Waiter Statements
Report Blocker and Waiter SQL Statements
Waitstats
Sample scripts and stored procedures for working with SQL Server waitstats.
Retrieve Waiter List Information
Retrieve Waitstat Snapshots
A blog about SQL Server, Books, Movies and life in general
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Saturday, November 04, 2006
How Are Dates Stored In SQL Server?
Internally dates are stored as 2 integers. The first integer is the number of dates before or after the base date (1900/01/01). The second integer stores the number of clock ticks after midnight, each tick is 1/300 of a second.
So if we run the following code for the base date (1900/01/01)
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '1900-01-01 00:00:00.000'
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4)) AS DateInt,
SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4) AS DateBinary
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4)) AS TimeInt, SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4) AS TimeBinary
Go
The results are
DateInt DateBinary
----------- ----------
0 0x00000000
TimeInt TimeBinary
----------- ----------
0 0x00000000
If we use the max date 9999/12/31
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '9999-12-31 23:59:59.997'
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4)) AS DateInt,
SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4) AS DateBinary
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4)) AS TimeInt, SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4) AS TimeBinary
Go
we get the following result
DateInt DateBinary
----------- ----------
2958463 0x002D247F
TimeInt TimeBinary
----------- ----------
25919999 0x018B81FF
If you take binary values and convert to datetime you get the following results
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x0000000000000001) --1 Tick 1/300 of a second
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.003
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x000000000000012C) -- 1 minute = 300 ticks
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:01.000
SELECT CONVERT(INT,0x12C) --= 300
SELECT CONVERT(VARBINARY(3),300) --= 0x00012C
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x0000000100000000) --add 1 day
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-02 00:00:00.000
For smalldatetime the time is stored as the number of minutes after midnight
Now here is some fun stuff
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .0
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .1
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 02:24:00.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .12
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 02:52:48.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '0'
SELECT @d
GO
Server: Msg 241, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Syntax error converting datetime from character string.
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 0
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
So there is no implicit conversion, o is fine 'o' is not
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 20061030
SELECT @d
GO
Server: Msg 8115, Level 16, State 2, Line 2
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime.
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '20061030'
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--2006-10-30 00:00:00.000
Here we have the reverse, the varchar value is fine but the int is not.
This happens because the max integer value that a datetime can take is 36523
If we run the following we are okay
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 2958463
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--9999-12-31 00:00:00.000
So if we run the following code for the base date (1900/01/01)
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '1900-01-01 00:00:00.000'
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4)) AS DateInt,
SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4) AS DateBinary
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4)) AS TimeInt, SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4) AS TimeBinary
Go
The results are
DateInt DateBinary
----------- ----------
0 0x00000000
TimeInt TimeBinary
----------- ----------
0 0x00000000
If we use the max date 9999/12/31
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '9999-12-31 23:59:59.997'
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4)) AS DateInt,
SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),1,4) AS DateBinary
SELECT CONVERT(INT,SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4)) AS TimeInt, SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARBINARY(8),@d),5,4) AS TimeBinary
Go
we get the following result
DateInt DateBinary
----------- ----------
2958463 0x002D247F
TimeInt TimeBinary
----------- ----------
25919999 0x018B81FF
If you take binary values and convert to datetime you get the following results
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x0000000000000001) --1 Tick 1/300 of a second
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.003
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x000000000000012C) -- 1 minute = 300 ticks
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:01.000
SELECT CONVERT(INT,0x12C) --= 300
SELECT CONVERT(VARBINARY(3),300) --= 0x00012C
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,0x0000000100000000) --add 1 day
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-02 00:00:00.000
For smalldatetime the time is stored as the number of minutes after midnight
Now here is some fun stuff
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .0
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .1
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 02:24:00.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = .12
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 02:52:48.000
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '0'
SELECT @d
GO
Server: Msg 241, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Syntax error converting datetime from character string.
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 0
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
So there is no implicit conversion, o is fine 'o' is not
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 20061030
SELECT @d
GO
Server: Msg 8115, Level 16, State 2, Line 2
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime.
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = '20061030'
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--2006-10-30 00:00:00.000
Here we have the reverse, the varchar value is fine but the int is not.
This happens because the max integer value that a datetime can take is 36523
If we run the following we are okay
DECLARE @d DATETIME
SELECT @d = 2958463
SELECT @d
GO
------------------------------------------------------
--9999-12-31 00:00:00.000
Friday, November 03, 2006
ISO-11179 Naming Conventions
Straight from the man himself comes this statement posted in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming forum: "You need to read ISO-11179 so you use proper data element names. You
actually had "tbl-"on the table names! Sometimes "id" id a
prefix and sometimes it is a postfix."
Of course you know who I am talking about? No? Joe Celko of course. So what is ISO-11179?
The 11179 standard is a multipart standard that includes the following parts:
11179-1
Part 1: Framework, introduces and discusses fundamental ideas of data elements, value domains, data element concepts, conceptual domains, and classification schemes essential to the understanding of this set of standards and provides the context for associating the individual parts of ISO/IEC 11179.
11179-2
Part 2: Classification, provides a conceptual model for managing classification schemes. There are many structures used to organize classification schemes and there are many subject matter areas that classification schemes describe. So, this Part also provides a two-faceted classification for classification schemes themselves.
11179-3
Part 3: Registry Metamodel and Basic Attributes, specifies a conceptual model for a metadata registry. It is limited to a set of basic attributes for data elements, data element concepts, value domains, conceptual domains, classification schemes, and other related classes, called administered items. The basic attributes specified for data elements in ISO/IEC 11179-3:1994 are provided in this revision.
11179-4
Part 4: Formulation of Data Definitions, provides guidance on how to develop unambiguous data definitions. A number of specific rules and guidelines are presented in ISO/IEC 11179-4 that specify exactly how a data definition should be formed. A precise, well-formed definition is one of the most critical requirements for shared understanding of an administered item; well-formed definitions are imperative for the exchange of information. Only if every user has a common and exact understanding of the data item can it be exchanged trouble-free.
11179-5
Part 5: Naming and Identification Principles, provides guidance for the identification of administered items. Identification is a broad term for designating, or identifying, a particular data item. Identification can be accomplished in various ways, depending upon the use of the identifier. Identification includes the assignment of numerical identifiers that have no inherent meanings to humans; icons (graphic symbols to which meaning has been assigned); and names with embedded meaning, usually for human understanding, that are associated with the data item's definition and value domain.
11179-6
Part 6: Registration, provides instruction on how a registration applicant may register a data item with a central Registration Authority and the allocation of unique identifiers for each data item. Maintenance of administered items already registered is also specified in this document.
The one that deals with naming conventions is 11179-5 The link will point to a zip file which has a pdf file in it. The TOC of this pdf file is below
Contents
Foreword
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
4 Data Identifiers within a registry
5 Identification
6 Names
6.1 Names in a registry
6.2 Naming conventions
7 Development of naming conventions
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Scope principle
7.3 Authority principle
7.4 Semantic principle
7.5 Syntactic principle
7.6 Lexical principle
7.7 Uniqueness principle
Annex A (informative) Example naming conventions for names within an MDR registry
Annex B (informative) Example naming conventions for Asian languages
So check it out and hopefully you and your team can adapt a common naming conventions instead of having things named like employee_address, EmployeeAddress, employeeAddress and tblEmployeeAddress.
actually had "tbl-"on the table names! Sometimes "id" id a
prefix and sometimes it is a postfix."
Of course you know who I am talking about? No? Joe Celko of course. So what is ISO-11179?
The 11179 standard is a multipart standard that includes the following parts:
11179-1
Part 1: Framework, introduces and discusses fundamental ideas of data elements, value domains, data element concepts, conceptual domains, and classification schemes essential to the understanding of this set of standards and provides the context for associating the individual parts of ISO/IEC 11179.
11179-2
Part 2: Classification, provides a conceptual model for managing classification schemes. There are many structures used to organize classification schemes and there are many subject matter areas that classification schemes describe. So, this Part also provides a two-faceted classification for classification schemes themselves.
11179-3
Part 3: Registry Metamodel and Basic Attributes, specifies a conceptual model for a metadata registry. It is limited to a set of basic attributes for data elements, data element concepts, value domains, conceptual domains, classification schemes, and other related classes, called administered items. The basic attributes specified for data elements in ISO/IEC 11179-3:1994 are provided in this revision.
11179-4
Part 4: Formulation of Data Definitions, provides guidance on how to develop unambiguous data definitions. A number of specific rules and guidelines are presented in ISO/IEC 11179-4 that specify exactly how a data definition should be formed. A precise, well-formed definition is one of the most critical requirements for shared understanding of an administered item; well-formed definitions are imperative for the exchange of information. Only if every user has a common and exact understanding of the data item can it be exchanged trouble-free.
11179-5
Part 5: Naming and Identification Principles, provides guidance for the identification of administered items. Identification is a broad term for designating, or identifying, a particular data item. Identification can be accomplished in various ways, depending upon the use of the identifier. Identification includes the assignment of numerical identifiers that have no inherent meanings to humans; icons (graphic symbols to which meaning has been assigned); and names with embedded meaning, usually for human understanding, that are associated with the data item's definition and value domain.
11179-6
Part 6: Registration, provides instruction on how a registration applicant may register a data item with a central Registration Authority and the allocation of unique identifiers for each data item. Maintenance of administered items already registered is also specified in this document.
The one that deals with naming conventions is 11179-5 The link will point to a zip file which has a pdf file in it. The TOC of this pdf file is below
Contents
Foreword
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
4 Data Identifiers within a registry
5 Identification
6 Names
6.1 Names in a registry
6.2 Naming conventions
7 Development of naming conventions
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Scope principle
7.3 Authority principle
7.4 Semantic principle
7.5 Syntactic principle
7.6 Lexical principle
7.7 Uniqueness principle
Annex A (informative) Example naming conventions for names within an MDR registry
Annex B (informative) Example naming conventions for Asian languages
So check it out and hopefully you and your team can adapt a common naming conventions instead of having things named like employee_address, EmployeeAddress, employeeAddress and tblEmployeeAddress.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
SQL Teaser
Try to guess what the output will be of the following SQL Select statement (don't worry, you can't get it right ;-)
First guess then run this
SELECT 123.654, 123d6, 123e4, '123'e4
Surprise!!!!!!
I lifted/stole/borrowed the select statement from Mladen Prajdic's blog
First guess then run this
SELECT 123.654, 123d6, 123e4, '123'e4
Surprise!!!!!!
I lifted/stole/borrowed the select statement from Mladen Prajdic's blog
Top 5 Posts For October 2006
Below are the top 5 posts according to Google Analytics for the month of October 2006 in order by pageviews descending
Five Ways To Return Values From Stored Procedures
SQL Query Optimizations
Do You Know How Between Works With Dates?
NULL Trouble In SQL Server Land
SQL Server 2000 Undocumented Procedures For Files, Drives and Directories
The reason Five Ways To Return Values From Stored Procedures was number one is because it was posted on digg. Once something makes it to digg and people seemed to like it then you can expect thousands of hits or even more (The Digg Effect) So far 33 people have dugg this story. The link to the digg URL is below
http://digg.com/programming/Five_Ways_To_Return_Values_From_Stored_Procedures
After that 23 people saved it on del.icio.us that link is below
http://del.icio.us/url/ed6cbc71d79ae5f56ac75fe4122ee772
I will update the top 10 of all time (below the masthead) later today
[edit]Why wait? I have updated the top 10, you can see it here: http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-10-articles-of-all-time.html[/edit]
Five Ways To Return Values From Stored Procedures
SQL Query Optimizations
Do You Know How Between Works With Dates?
NULL Trouble In SQL Server Land
SQL Server 2000 Undocumented Procedures For Files, Drives and Directories
The reason Five Ways To Return Values From Stored Procedures was number one is because it was posted on digg. Once something makes it to digg and people seemed to like it then you can expect thousands of hits or even more (The Digg Effect) So far 33 people have dugg this story. The link to the digg URL is below
http://digg.com/programming/Five_Ways_To_Return_Values_From_Stored_Procedures
After that 23 people saved it on del.icio.us that link is below
http://del.icio.us/url/ed6cbc71d79ae5f56ac75fe4122ee772
I will update the top 10 of all time (below the masthead) later today
[edit]Why wait? I have updated the top 10, you can see it here: http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-10-articles-of-all-time.html[/edit]
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Top SQL Server Google Searches For October 2006
These are the top SQL Searches on this site for the month of October. I have left out searches that have nothing to do with SQL Server or programming (Like Jessica Alba Playboy Pics)
Here is the list:
Line 1: Incorrect syntax near 'TRY'.
pivot
execute specific dts steps
"The maximum allowed length of the install path is 36"
ole The provider ran out of memory.
execute dts step active x
El proveedor OLE DB 'SQLOLEDB' indica que el objeto no tiene columnas.
locks
The provider ran out of memory
SQL ADD 1 DAY TO CURRENT DATE
dts activex
xp_sendmail attachments
I always find it interesting to see what people are searching for and it also gives me ideas for things to write about
So I will cover PIVOT and UNPIVOT and SQL ADD 1 DAY TO CURRENT DATE by the end of this week
Later today I will post the top 5 post of October and I will also update the top 10 posts of all time
Here is the list:
Line 1: Incorrect syntax near 'TRY'.
pivot
execute specific dts steps
"The maximum allowed length of the install path is 36"
ole The provider ran out of memory.
execute dts step active x
El proveedor OLE DB 'SQLOLEDB' indica que el objeto no tiene columnas.
locks
The provider ran out of memory
SQL ADD 1 DAY TO CURRENT DATE
dts activex
xp_sendmail attachments
I always find it interesting to see what people are searching for and it also gives me ideas for things to write about
So I will cover PIVOT and UNPIVOT and SQL ADD 1 DAY TO CURRENT DATE by the end of this week
Later today I will post the top 5 post of October and I will also update the top 10 posts of all time
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Download A FREE Trial Of Spotlight On SQL Server And Win A Xbox 360
I just received an email from Quest Software. Quest is giving away 15 Xbox 360™ game systems in 15 days! Download a free trial of Spotlight® on SQL Server Enterprise and you'll be automatically entered into the Quest "Xbox-a-Day Giveaway" drawing.
Now you have a chance to win the Xbox 360™ and detect, diagnose and resolve database performance issues with ease—just by trying Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise.
What is Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise?
Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise is an award-winning database diagnostics tool that can help you ensure data availability and prevent problems before they occur.
Discover, diagnose and resolve SQL Server performance issues
Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise provides an agent-less easy-to-use database issue discovery solution that enables you to identify and resolve SQL Server performance problems within your SQL Server environment. This powerful tool pinpoints the underlying SQL server contention issues and processes for fast and efficient database administration.
With Spotlight, DBAs can drill down to locate in-depth information about the source of thousands of SQL Server performance problems such as: a specific user, a resource-intensive SQL transaction, an I/O bottleneck, a lock or wait. Spotlight for SQL Server Enterprise sets a baseline for normal activity for each instance, and can set thresholds, notify users and display alerts when it detects performance bottlenecks of any kind.
Spotlight not only monitors the SQL Server Environment, but the underlying operating system on which it resides. From an overview screen, DBAs can view the most active SQL Server sessions, SQL statements, Replication information , blocks, deadlocks, waits, and disk activityto pinpoint and alleviate problems before they occur before and seriously impact end users.
Through one single interface, Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise answers many questions related to performance:
How is each SQL Server instance performing?
How is the SQL Server Environment as a whole performing?
Where and when are the performance bottlenecks occurring?
How do I catch the problems before they arise?
Who or what is causing the problem and how do I resolve it?
Go HERE for more details
Now you have a chance to win the Xbox 360™ and detect, diagnose and resolve database performance issues with ease—just by trying Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise.
What is Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise?
Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise is an award-winning database diagnostics tool that can help you ensure data availability and prevent problems before they occur.
Discover, diagnose and resolve SQL Server performance issues
Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise provides an agent-less easy-to-use database issue discovery solution that enables you to identify and resolve SQL Server performance problems within your SQL Server environment. This powerful tool pinpoints the underlying SQL server contention issues and processes for fast and efficient database administration.
With Spotlight, DBAs can drill down to locate in-depth information about the source of thousands of SQL Server performance problems such as: a specific user, a resource-intensive SQL transaction, an I/O bottleneck, a lock or wait. Spotlight for SQL Server Enterprise sets a baseline for normal activity for each instance, and can set thresholds, notify users and display alerts when it detects performance bottlenecks of any kind.
Spotlight not only monitors the SQL Server Environment, but the underlying operating system on which it resides. From an overview screen, DBAs can view the most active SQL Server sessions, SQL statements, Replication information , blocks, deadlocks, waits, and disk activityto pinpoint and alleviate problems before they occur before and seriously impact end users.
Through one single interface, Spotlight on SQL Server Enterprise answers many questions related to performance:
How is each SQL Server instance performing?
How is the SQL Server Environment as a whole performing?
Where and when are the performance bottlenecks occurring?
How do I catch the problems before they arise?
Who or what is causing the problem and how do I resolve it?
Go HERE for more details
Monday, October 30, 2006
Working Four Days A week Until Next Year
I will be working four days a week only until next year. I did not take a vacation this year since my wife was pregnant with twins. We couldn't go anywhere because the due date was the first week of August; twins usually arrive a couple of weeks earlier. Since we didn't know the exact due date and had to go for monitoring every week we decided not to go anywhere. the end result is that I have 8 (out of 10) vacation days left. So I will be taking wednesdays off until 2007.
I used to live in the Netherlands where everyone has five weeks vacation. So when I came to the United States I was surprised that there was not a law like that here. Besides the five weeks of vacation in Holland you also get 8% of your salary as vacation money. So when you go on vacation you can use that as spending money.
I saved the 'best' for last: if you are unemployed in Holland then you have the same rights. that's right five weeks vacation, 8% vacation money. In Holland you can be unemplyed for years and years, in the US you get 6 months unemployment and the cap is $405 a week. After 6 months you are on your own. I think they should do exactly the same in Holland (no wonder the top tax bracket was 72% in the late nineties; it is I believe 52% now). I knew a lot of people who would be unemployed and work off the books...........
I used to live in the Netherlands where everyone has five weeks vacation. So when I came to the United States I was surprised that there was not a law like that here. Besides the five weeks of vacation in Holland you also get 8% of your salary as vacation money. So when you go on vacation you can use that as spending money.
I saved the 'best' for last: if you are unemployed in Holland then you have the same rights. that's right five weeks vacation, 8% vacation money. In Holland you can be unemplyed for years and years, in the US you get 6 months unemployment and the cap is $405 a week. After 6 months you are on your own. I think they should do exactly the same in Holland (no wonder the top tax bracket was 72% in the late nineties; it is I believe 52% now). I knew a lot of people who would be unemployed and work off the books...........
Friday, October 27, 2006
Halloween SQL Teaser
Try to guess without running the code which of the following 3 queries will return a value for maxvalue that is not null
Is it A, B or C?
--A
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SELECT @maxvalue = MAX(crdate)
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
SELECT 'A' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
--B
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SELECT TOP 1 @maxValue = crdate
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
ORDER BY crdate DESC
SELECT 'B' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
--C
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SET @maxvalue = (SELECT TOP 1 crdate
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
ORDER BY crdate DESC
SELECT 'C' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
Let me know if you were correct. I must admit I saw this code on Simon Sabin's blog
To understand why this happens read this Tony Rogerson article: T-SQL Value assignment SET vs SELECT
So what does this have to do with Halloween? Nothing really.
Is it A, B or C?
--A
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SELECT @maxvalue = MAX(crdate)
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
SELECT 'A' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
--B
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SELECT TOP 1 @maxValue = crdate
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
ORDER BY crdate DESC
SELECT 'B' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
--C
DECLARE @maxValue DATETIME
SET @maxValue = '1/1/1900'
SET @maxvalue = (SELECT TOP 1 crdate
FROM sysobjects WHERE ID = -99
ORDER BY crdate DESC
SELECT 'C' ,@maxvalue maxValue
GO
Let me know if you were correct. I must admit I saw this code on Simon Sabin's blog
To understand why this happens read this Tony Rogerson article: T-SQL Value assignment SET vs SELECT
So what does this have to do with Halloween? Nothing really.
One Of The Reasons I Participate In Forums And Newsgroups
This is one of the reasons I participate in SQL Server newsgroups and forums
A person had the following update statement
On the table that got updated (Object_data) the following trigger was created
I suggested that the person did not need the cursor since he is inserting everything anyway into the object_datahist table
I decided to modify the trigger as follows
I also suggested modifying the following line from the update query
and convert(varchar,injurydate,101) = convert(varchar,claim_injury_date,101)
to
and injurydate = claim_injury_date
since the dates are the same anyway
This is the response I got
"I tested removing the cursor driven trigger from the Object_Data table in development and replaced it with the set based up date you provided. Here is what happened:
20,784 records in the test.
1. Using the current trigger I canceled the update after an hour and eleven minutes of running. It had updated 10,218 rows.
2. Using the set based trigger it ran in eleven seconds and generated the correct amount of history.
That's really something to me! Thanks again!"
You see, this is one of the reasons I participate in forums/newsgroups because it feels good to help other people. Another reason is that you can look at the responses from the SQL MVP's and see how they would handle certain situations. I remember running into problems once and I also remembered that I saw this same problem in a newsgroup. after that it's a quick Google and you find your answer
A person had the following update statement
Update Object_data
set External_Claim_Number = BWCClaimNum
From yson_Claims_eDocs_10_27_2006
where LastName = INJ_lname
and FirstName = INJ_fname
and SSN = inj_ssn
and convert(varchar,injurydate,101) = convert(varchar,claim_injury_date,101)
and convert(varchar,pkclaim) = internal_claim_Number
and BWCClaimNum is not null
and BWCClaimNum <> External_Claim_Number
On the table that got updated (Object_data) the following trigger was created
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
ALTER TRIGGER [tr_Object_Data_IU] ON [dbo].[OBJECT_DATA]
FOR UPDATE,Insert
AS
declare @rows int
declare @object_Data_ID int
set @rows = @@ROWCOUNT
if @rows = 0
return
if @rows = 1
begin
select @object_Data_Id = object_data_id
from inserted
goto singlerecord
end
declare curObject insensitive cursor for
select object_data_id
from inserted
open curObject
fetch next from curObject into @object_data_id
while (@@fetch_status <> -1)
begin
singlerecord:
insert object_datahist (OBJECT_DATA_ID,OBJECT_ID,INJ_SSN,INJ_LNAME,INJ_FNAME,INJ_SEX,EXTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,
INTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,CLAIM_INJURY_DATE,CLAIM_DOCUMENT_DOS,CLAIM_RISK_NUMBER,DOCUMENT_TYPE,
DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE,DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE2,EMPLOYER,BILL_NUMBER,PROVIDER_NUMBER,OTHER,GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME,
YEAR_NUM,DateChanged,ChangedBy,Change
,PROV_FAX_NUM)
select OBJECT_DATA_ID,OBJECT_ID,INJ_SSN,INJ_LNAME,INJ_FNAME,INJ_SEX,EXTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,INTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,
CLAIM_INJURY_DATE,CLAIM_DOCUMENT_DOS,CLAIM_RISK_NUMBER,DOCUMENT_TYPE,DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE,
DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE2,EMPLOYER,BILL_NUMBER,PROVIDER_NUMBER,OTHER,GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME,YEAR_NUM,
getdate(),user_name(),'U'
,PROV_FAX_NUM
from inserted where object_data_id = @object_data_id
if @rows = 1
return
fetch next from curObject into @object_data_id
end
close curObject
deallocate curObject
I suggested that the person did not need the cursor since he is inserting everything anyway into the object_datahist table
I decided to modify the trigger as follows
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
ALTER TRIGGER [tr_Object_Data_IU] ON [dbo].[OBJECT_DATA]
FOR UPDATE,Insert
AS
IF @@ROWCOUNT =0
RETURN
insert object_datahist (OBJECT_DATA_ID,OBJECT_ID,INJ_SSN,INJ_LNAME,INJ_FNAME,INJ_SEX,EXTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,
INTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,CLAIM_INJURY_DATE,CLAIM_DOCUMENT_DOS,CLAIM_RISK_NUMBER,DOCUMENT_TYPE,
DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE,DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE2,EMPLOYER,BILL_NUMBER,PROVIDER_NUMBER,OTHER,GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME,
YEAR_NUM,DateChanged,ChangedBy,Change
,PROV_FAX_NUM)
select OBJECT_DATA_ID,OBJECT_ID,INJ_SSN,INJ_LNAME,INJ_FNAME,INJ_SEX,EXTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,INTERNAL_CLAIM_NUMBER,
CLAIM_INJURY_DATE,CLAIM_DOCUMENT_DOS,CLAIM_RISK_NUMBER,DOCUMENT_TYPE,DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE,
DOCUMENT_SUBTYPE2,EMPLOYER,BILL_NUMBER,PROVIDER_NUMBER,OTHER,GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME,YEAR_NUM,
getdate(),user_name(),'U'
,PROV_FAX_NUM
from inserted
I also suggested modifying the following line from the update query
and convert(varchar,injurydate,101) = convert(varchar,claim_injury_date,101)
to
and injurydate = claim_injury_date
since the dates are the same anyway
This is the response I got
"I tested removing the cursor driven trigger from the Object_Data table in development and replaced it with the set based up date you provided. Here is what happened:
20,784 records in the test.
1. Using the current trigger I canceled the update after an hour and eleven minutes of running. It had updated 10,218 rows.
2. Using the set based trigger it ran in eleven seconds and generated the correct amount of history.
That's really something to me! Thanks again!"
You see, this is one of the reasons I participate in forums/newsgroups because it feels good to help other people. Another reason is that you can look at the responses from the SQL MVP's and see how they would handle certain situations. I remember running into problems once and I also remembered that I saw this same problem in a newsgroup. after that it's a quick Google and you find your answer
What Are You Watching On Halloween?
I have difficulty picking a movie to watch on Halloween.
Did any of you (my readers) see any of these movies below? Which movie would you pick?
Omen (2006 Edition)
The Gingerdead Man
Saw I
Saw II
Exorcist (Begining)
Seed of Chucky
Ringu
Texas Chainsaw
Silent hill
Hills have eyes
Underworld (evolutions)
Leave me a comment or send me an email by using the Contact Me link.
Did any of you (my readers) see any of these movies below? Which movie would you pick?
Omen (2006 Edition)
The Gingerdead Man
Saw I
Saw II
Exorcist (Begining)
Seed of Chucky
Ringu
Texas Chainsaw
Silent hill
Hills have eyes
Underworld (evolutions)
Leave me a comment or send me an email by using the Contact Me link.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
SQL Server experienced revenue growth of over 30%
Microsoft Corp. today announced first quarter revenue of $10.81 billion for the period ended September 30, 2006, an 11% increase over the same quarter of the prior year. Operating income for the quarter was $4.47 billion, an 11% increase compared with $4.05 billion in the prior year period. Net income and diluted earnings per share for the first quarter were $3.48 billion and $0.35 per share. For the same quarter of the previous year, net income and diluted earnings per share were $3.14 billion and $0.29, including a $0.02 per share charge for certain legal charges.
Server & Tools revenue increased 17% over the comparable quarter in the prior year, reflecting healthy performance for offerings such as SQL Server™ 2005, Windows Server®, Visual Studio® 2005 and BizTalk® Server. SQL Server experienced revenue growth of over 30%, as customers are increasingly deploying SQL Server for their mission critical, transaction-oriented databases.
Good news if you are a SQL Server developer
Server & Tools revenue increased 17% over the comparable quarter in the prior year, reflecting healthy performance for offerings such as SQL Server™ 2005, Windows Server®, Visual Studio® 2005 and BizTalk® Server. SQL Server experienced revenue growth of over 30%, as customers are increasingly deploying SQL Server for their mission critical, transaction-oriented databases.
Good news if you are a SQL Server developer
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Enable xp_cmdshell In SQL Server 2005 With The Surface Configuration Tool Or With A Script
This question popped up in a newsgroup today. How do I enable xp_cmdshell in SQL Server 2005? Well you can do it two ways; one is with a script and the other with the Surface Configuration Tool
Let's start with the Surface Configuration Tool
Surface Configuration Tool
You have to navigate to the tool from the start button, the path is below
Programs-->Microsoft SQL server 2005-->Configuration Tools-->Surface Configuration Tool
Then select Surface Area Configuration for Features (bottom one)
Expand Database Engine go all the way down to xp_cmdshell and click enable xp_cmdshell and hit apply
SQL Script
To do it with a script use the one below
EXECUTE sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
EXECUTE sp_configure 'xp_cmdshell', '1'
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
EXECUTE sp_configure 'show advanced options', 0
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
Let's start with the Surface Configuration Tool
Surface Configuration Tool
You have to navigate to the tool from the start button, the path is below
Programs-->Microsoft SQL server 2005-->Configuration Tools-->Surface Configuration Tool
Then select Surface Area Configuration for Features (bottom one)
Expand Database Engine go all the way down to xp_cmdshell and click enable xp_cmdshell and hit apply
SQL Script
To do it with a script use the one below
EXECUTE sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
EXECUTE sp_configure 'xp_cmdshell', '1'
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
EXECUTE sp_configure 'show advanced options', 0
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com In Top 100000 On Technorati
This blog is currently ranked 90,981 on Technorati
Rank: 90,981 (65 links from 30 blogs)
Not bad I guess, I wonder how long it will take to reach 50000?
The rank was 150000 just a couple of months ago so it's going towards the top (but will never reach it ;-( )
You can check the ranking here http://www.technorati.com/search/sqlservercode.blogspot.com and see who is linking here
Rank: 90,981 (65 links from 30 blogs)
Not bad I guess, I wonder how long it will take to reach 50000?
The rank was 150000 just a couple of months ago so it's going towards the top (but will never reach it ;-( )
You can check the ranking here http://www.technorati.com/search/sqlservercode.blogspot.com and see who is linking here
Microsoft Changing Live Search Back To MSN Search
Just saw The Island the other day and I must say I liked it a lot. I don't know why the movie didn't do as well as expected. The stars of the movie are Scarlett Johansson (Lost in Translation, Girl with a Pearl Earring) and Ewan McGregor ( Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith , Trainspotting , Moulin Rouge!) other prominent roles are for Sean Bean, Steve Buscemi and Michael Clarke Duncan.. The movie is directed by Michael Bay who did Pearl Harbor and Armageddon. Michael Bay is currently working on The Hitcher and Transformers The links are all to IMDB in case you want more details about any of the movies.
The best part of the movie: the car chase.
The car chase is probably the best ever; it even beats the one from the second Matrix movie.
The movie takes place in the year 2050 and people have clones made as insurance; if their liver gives up then they just take the liver from the clone. These clones live isolated underground and have no idea what's going on; they think that they survived some contamination. Every now and then a lottery takes place and the winner goes to the Island. In reality the winner goes to the operating table. I won't give away the whole story you watch that yourself
There is some major product placement in this movie. The Xbox is featured in the movie alongside MSN Search; that's right not Windows Live Search. I guess they can always release a director's cut and 'fix' that. Cadillac has some top of the line car that costs half a million dollars; How much is half a million in the year 2050? To me it seems that a Porsche Carrera would cost about $500000 in about 50 years. Anyway the 'real' Ewan in the movie, who is very rich complains when his 'very' expensive car gets trashed. Would he really get that upset over the car; his clone is more expensive and he tries to kill the clone.
If you can catch the movie on HBO/On Demand then watch this movie. If you don’t want to watch the whole movie then at least watch the car scene; you won’t regret it
The best part of the movie: the car chase.
The car chase is probably the best ever; it even beats the one from the second Matrix movie.
The movie takes place in the year 2050 and people have clones made as insurance; if their liver gives up then they just take the liver from the clone. These clones live isolated underground and have no idea what's going on; they think that they survived some contamination. Every now and then a lottery takes place and the winner goes to the Island. In reality the winner goes to the operating table. I won't give away the whole story you watch that yourself
There is some major product placement in this movie. The Xbox is featured in the movie alongside MSN Search; that's right not Windows Live Search. I guess they can always release a director's cut and 'fix' that. Cadillac has some top of the line car that costs half a million dollars; How much is half a million in the year 2050? To me it seems that a Porsche Carrera would cost about $500000 in about 50 years. Anyway the 'real' Ewan in the movie, who is very rich complains when his 'very' expensive car gets trashed. Would he really get that upset over the car; his clone is more expensive and he tries to kill the clone.
If you can catch the movie on HBO/On Demand then watch this movie. If you don’t want to watch the whole movie then at least watch the car scene; you won’t regret it
Monday, October 23, 2006
Do You Know How Between Works With Dates?
Do you use between to return data that has dates? Do you know that between will get everything since midnight from the first criteria and up to midnight exactly from the second criteria. If you do BETWEEN 2006-10-01 AND 2006-10-02 then all the values that are greater or equal than 2006-10-01 and less or equal to 2006-10-02 will be returned. So no values after 2006-10-02 midnight will be returned.
Let's test this out, first let's create this table
CREATE TABLE SomeDates (DateColumn DATETIME)
Insert 2 values
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:00:00.000')
Return everything between '2006-10-01' and '2006-10-02'
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061002'
ORDER BY DateColumn
This works without a problem
Let's add some more dates including the time portion
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:01:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:59.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:01.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:01:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:12:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 23:00:00.000')
Return everything between '2006-10-01' and '2006-10-02'
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061002'
ORDER BY DateColumn
Here is where it goes wrong; for 2006-10-02 only the midnight value is returned the other ones are ignored
Now if we change 2006-10-02 to 2006-10-03 we get what we want
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
Now insert a value for 2006-10-03 (midnight)
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-03 00:00:00.000')
Run the query again
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
We get back 2006-10-03 00:00:00.000; between will return the date if it is exactly midnight
If you use >= and < then you get exactly what you need
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn >= '20061001' AND DateColumn < '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
--Clean up
DROP TABLE SomeDates
So be careful when using between because you might get back rows that you did not expect to get back and it might mess up your reporting if you do counts or sums
Let's test this out, first let's create this table
CREATE TABLE SomeDates (DateColumn DATETIME)
Insert 2 values
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:00:00.000')
Return everything between '2006-10-01' and '2006-10-02'
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061002'
ORDER BY DateColumn
This works without a problem
Let's add some more dates including the time portion
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:01:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:59.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-02 00:00:01.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:01:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 00:12:00.000')
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-01 23:00:00.000')
Return everything between '2006-10-01' and '2006-10-02'
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061002'
ORDER BY DateColumn
Here is where it goes wrong; for 2006-10-02 only the midnight value is returned the other ones are ignored
Now if we change 2006-10-02 to 2006-10-03 we get what we want
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
Now insert a value for 2006-10-03 (midnight)
INSERT INTO SomeDates VALUES('2006-10-03 00:00:00.000')
Run the query again
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn BETWEEN '20061001' AND '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
We get back 2006-10-03 00:00:00.000; between will return the date if it is exactly midnight
If you use >= and < then you get exactly what you need
SELECT *
FROM SomeDates
WHERE DateColumn >= '20061001' AND DateColumn < '20061003'
ORDER BY DateColumn
--Clean up
DROP TABLE SomeDates
So be careful when using between because you might get back rows that you did not expect to get back and it might mess up your reporting if you do counts or sums
Sunday, October 22, 2006
SQL Server 2005 Practical Troubleshooting: The Database Engine Sample Chapter Available
Ken Henderson has posted a sample chapter from the forthcoming book SQL Server 2005 Practical Troubleshooting: The Database Engine on his blog. The sample chapter is: Chapter 4 Procedure Cache Issues. This is a must read for anyone who is troubleshooting SQL Server queries and procedures. Some of the things covered are: Cached Object Leaks, Cursor Leaks, Parameter Sniffing, Excessive Compilation, Poor Plan Reuse and How Cache Lookups Work. I think that this is the first time I have seen parameter sniffing described in a book. Check it out and let me know what you think.
SQLQueryStress Beta 1 Available For Download
Adam Machanic has made available beta 1 of the SQLQueryStress tool. It provides some support for query parameterization and options for collection of I/O and CPU metrics. It is not intended to replace tools such as Visual Studio Team System's load tests, but rather to be a simple and easy-to-use tool in the DBA or database developer's kit.
To download the tool and read the documentation go here: http://www.datamanipulation.net/SQLQueryStress/
To download the tool and read the documentation go here: http://www.datamanipulation.net/SQLQueryStress/
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Visual Studio Team Edition for Database Professionals CTP 6 Is Available For Download
Gert Drapers has announced that CTP6 of Visual Studio Team Edition for Database Professionals is available for download
This is an overview of the highlights in CTP6
This is an overview of the highlights in CTP6
- Full support for SQL Server 2000 & 2005 objects, the parser work has been completed
- Extended Properties support, we know import and deploy all your extended properties
- Inline constraint support, if you do not want to separate them out, we allow them inline as well
- Pre- and post deployment scripts population during Import Script
- Full support for command line build & deploy and Team Build
- A new Import Schema Wizard which is also integrated with the New Project Wizard to make project creation and import a single stop shop
- Synchronize your database project from Schema Compare, compare your project with a database and pull the differences in to the database project
- Schema refactoring is now allowed even if you have files in a warning state
- Resolve 3 and 4 part name usage when the referenced database is locally present, same for linked servers
- The product no longer installs SQL Express; you can pick your own SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition or SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition instance on the local box. When you first start the product for the first time we will ask you to choose an local instance to use
- Display detailed Schema Object properties in the VS Property Window for selected objects in the Schema View
- Separation of user target database settings through user project files, this allows users to work against a different target instance without changing the main project file.
- We made great progress on the overall stability and performance of the product across the board, project creation, importing your schema, reloading project and making changes to your schema
- And last but not least we fixed many reported customer problems!
Visit The Data Dude blog for more info
Monday, October 16, 2006
SQL Server Database Publishing Wizard CTP 1 released
SQL Server Hosting Toolkit Released
The goal of the SQL Server Hosting Toolkit is to enable a great experience around SQL Server in shared hosting environments.
The toolkit will eventually consist of a suite of tools and services that hosters can deploy for use by their customers. It will also serve as an incubation vehicle for tools that hosting customers can download and use directly, regardless of whether their hoster has deployed the toolkit
Database Publishing Wizard Community Technology Preview 1
The Database Publishing Wizard enables the deployment of SQL Server 2005 databases into a hosted environment on either a SQL Server 2000 or 2005 server. It generates a SQL script file which can be used to recreate the database in shared hosting environments where the only connectivity to a server is through a web-based control panel with a scripting window.
The goal of the SQL Server Hosting Toolkit is to enable a great experience around SQL Server in shared hosting environments.
The toolkit will eventually consist of a suite of tools and services that hosters can deploy for use by their customers. It will also serve as an incubation vehicle for tools that hosting customers can download and use directly, regardless of whether their hoster has deployed the toolkit
Database Publishing Wizard Community Technology Preview 1
The Database Publishing Wizard enables the deployment of SQL Server 2005 databases into a hosted environment on either a SQL Server 2000 or 2005 server. It generates a SQL script file which can be used to recreate the database in shared hosting environments where the only connectivity to a server is through a web-based control panel with a scripting window.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)